Manupatra Academy

Explore. Learn. Upskill. All Things Law

Courses, Cases, Research, and Resources in One Place

New

Internships

Opportunities : Playbook : Videos

Learn More

1^st Year Law Notes

Structured notes with flashcards to help first-year students grasp core subjects quickly.

Know More

New

2^nd Year Law Notes

Structured notes with flashcards to help second-year students grasp core subjects quickly.

Know More

New

3^rd Year Law Notes

Structured notes with flashcards to help third-year students grasp core subjects quickly.

Know More

News and Recent Judgment Gist (BETA)

News
Gist

1. Umar Khalid seeks open hearing in review against bail refusal in Delhi riot case

Umar Khalid seeks open hearing in review against bail refusal in Delhi riot case

Umar Khalid seeks open hearing in review against bail refusal in Delhi riot case Umar Khalid seeks open hearing in review against bail refusal in Delhi riot case Khalid has filed a review petition against the Supreme Court’s January 5 judgment, which had denied him bail Former Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) student Umar Khalid on Monday urged the Supreme Court to allow an open court hearing and oral arguments in his review petition challenging the denial of bail in the alleged larger conspiracy case linked to the 2020 Delhi riots. Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for Khalid, referred the matter before a bench led by Justice Aravind Kumar, who also authored the January 5 order refusing bail, and requested that the review be heard in open court instead of being decided in chambers. “I wanted to make a mention about a review petition…it is listed on Wednesday. My request is…if you could have it in an open Court,” submitted Sibal. “We will look into the paper, and if required, we will call it,” said Justice Kumar. Review petitions are ordinarily decided in chambers by judges, without oral arguments or open court hearings. Khalid has filed a review petition against the Supreme Court’s January 5 judgment, which had denied him bail under the stringent provisions of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) in the Delhi riots conspiracy case. A bench of comprising Justice Kumar and Justice NV Anjaria held that the material on record disclosed a prima facie case against Khalid and co-accused Sharjeel Imam, attributing to them a “central and formative role” in the alleged conspiracy. The court had observed that their involvement extended to “planning, mobilisation and strategic direction,” placing them on a different footing from other accused. Rejecting the plea for bail, the Supreme Court had ruled that prolonged incarceration alone cannot…

2. SC issues notice to Centre on PIL challenging provisions of digital personal data protection law

SC issues notice to Centre on PIL challenging provisions of digital personal data protection law

SC issues notice to Centre on PIL challenging provisions of digital personal data protection law SC issues notice to Centre on PIL challenging provisions of digital personal data protection law SC issues notice to Centre on PIL challenging provisions of digital personal data protection law New Delhi, The Supreme Court on Monday sought a response of the Centre on a PIL challenging provisions of the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 that allegedly dilute transparency under the 2005 Right to Information Act. A bench comprising Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi sought responses from the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions and the Ministry of Law and Justice after taking note of the submissions of senior advocate Shayam Divan appearing for the PIL petitioners. The bench also directed that Rajasthan be also impleaded as a party to the proceedings. The PIL was filed by 'Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan' along with activists Aruna Roy, Nikhil Dey and Shankar Singh Rawat. The petition challenges Section 44 of the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, which substitutes Section 8 of the RTI Act. "Issue a writ of certiorari or a declaration, striking down Section 44 of the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, insofar as it substitutes Section 8 of the Right to Information Act, 2005, as unconstitutional and void, being violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India," the plea said. Among the key reliefs sought, the petitioners have urged the court to restore the original Section 8 of the RTI Act, along with its proviso, with retrospective effect from November 13, 2025. "Declare that the proactive disclosure mandate under Section 4 of the RTI Act, which enabled disclosure of beneficiary data, muster rolls, social audit records, and similar records affecting rights of citizens under Article 21 of the…

3. Supreme Court issues notice to ECI, Centre on plea for biometric, facial recognition for voting

Supreme Court issues notice to ECI, Centre on plea for biometric, facial recognition for voting The Supreme Court on Monday sought responses from the Central government and the Election Commission of

Supreme Court issues notice to ECI, Centre on plea for biometric, facial recognition for voting

Supreme Court issues notice to ECI, Centre on plea for biometric, facial recognition for voting The Supreme Court on Monday sought responses from the Central government and the Election Commission of India (ECI) on a petition advocating the use of biometric authentication and facial recognition technology before voters are allowed to cast their ballots. A Bench led by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, alongside Justice Joymalya Bagchi, issued notice to both the Centre and the ECI, signalling its intent to examine the legal and constitutional dimensions of the proposal. The petition, filed by BJP leader Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay, calls for the introduction of biometric and facial recognition systems to verify voters prior to voting. During the hearing, the apex court observed that implementing such a system would require amendments to existing electoral laws and rules. The court also noted that deploying biometric and facial recognition infrastructure across the country would involve a substantial financial burden on the exchequer. The Bench initially expressed reservations about issuing notice at this stage and suggested that the petitioner first approach the Election Commission. “ECI needs to give us a reply and if State does not help or finance ministry does not pass budget then again we can be approached. But issuing notice at this stage is not needed,” quoted the Supreme Court judges. Upadhyay, appearing in person, emphasised that the proposal would require coordination with State governments.

4. Supreme Court seeks responses of Centre, States and Union Territories on PIL for implementation of Right to Education

Supreme Court seeks responses of Centre, States and Union Territories on PIL for implementation of Right to Education The Supreme Court on Monday (April 13, 2026) sought the responses of the Centre, S

5. Supreme Court seeks responses from Centre, others on on plea concerning MSP

Supreme Court seeks responses from Centre, others on on plea concerning MSP The Supreme Court on Monday (April 13, 2026) sought responses from the Centre and others on a plea to accord weightage to st

1. Channappa (D) thr. L.Rs. vs. Parvatewwa (D) thr. L.Rs. (09.04.2026 - SC)(MANU/SC/0338/2026)

The Supreme Court of India addressed whether Suit - II, filed by Parvatewwa (represented by Prema), was barred by res judicata or Order II Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, given prior proceeding

2. Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited and Ors. vs. R.Z. Malpani (09.04.2026 - SC)(MANU/SC/0337/2026)

The Supreme Court of India addressed whether a valid arbitration agreement existed between Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL) and R.Z. Malpani, following a letter of i

3. Nirmal Ujjwal Credit Co-operative Society Ltd. vs. Ravi Sethia and Ors. (09.04.2026 - SC)(MANU/SC/0336/2026)

The Supreme Court of India addressed the eligibility of Nirmal Ujjwal Credit Co-operative Society Ltd. to submit a resolution plan for Morarji Textiles Ltd. under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2

4. Roma Ahuja vs. The State and Ors. (09.04.2026 - SC)(MANU/SC/0335/2026)

The Supreme Court of India addressed whether the limitation period for taking cognizance of an offence should be computed from the date of filing the complaint or the date of cognizance by the magistr

5. Russi Fisheries P. Ltd. and Ors. vs. Bhavna Seth and Ors. (09.04.2026 - SC)(MANU/SC/0334/2026)

The Supreme Court of India addressed the appeal by Russi Fisheries P. Ltd. and others against Bhavna Seth and others concerning the specific performance of a land sale agreement. The core issue was wh

View More Gist.. View More News..

Manupatra Certified Legal Research Program

Module-based learning : Legal research skills : Certification test

Learn More

Law Students Hub

Notes : Flashcards : Landmark Cases & more…

Learn More

New

Legal Glossary

Complex terms decoded : Easy explanations

Learn More

Courses

Structured learning : Practice-oriented modules : Different stages of legal practice

Learn More

On-demand Courses

Recorded classes : Comprehensive reading material :Quiz

Learn More

Self-Paced Certification

Courses to upskill or reskill

Learn More

Webinars

Recordings of experts views :Diverse topics

Learn More

Law Teachers Hub

Readings : Resources for legal educators

Learn More

Legal Posts

Explainers : Blogs : Articles : Case Analysis

Learn More

Survey Reports

AI Adoption : Technology in law

Learn More

Illustrated Cases

Legal Design : Supreme Court Cases : Multilingual Exploration

Learn More

Our Partners

Why Join Manupatra Academy

Brought to you by Manupatra the leaders in legal tech domain.

Curated Resources: A vast repository of meticulously compiled resources tailored for educators and learners.
Diverse Courses: An array of courses designed to cater to various levels of expertise, from beginners to advanced.
User-Friendly Interface: Accessible on any device, our intuitive interface ensures seamless navigation.

What Our Learners Say

User-Friendly Interface: Accessible on any device, our intuitive interface ensures seamless navigation.

Certification Courses 3-Day Civil Drafting Workshop

It was extremely beneficial and practical… really helped me understand the nuances of civil drafting and boosted my confidence in preparing real pleadings.

Certification Courses 3-Day Civil Drafting Workshop

The sessions were so insightful and well-structured… the faculty explained every concept with patience and clarity, which made learning much easier.

Certification Courses 3-Day Civil Drafting Workshop

Honestly, it was a great learning experience… the course covered everything from plaints to petitions in such a smooth and engaging way.

Certification Courses 3-Day Civil Drafting Workshop

The workshop was very hands-on and practical… I really liked the live feedback and the real examples shared during drafting exercises.

Certification Courses 3-Day Civil Drafting Workshop

Very well conducted and informative… I just wish it could’ve been a bit longer because the sessions were that helpful.

Certification Courses Mastering Microsoft Word for Legal Work

The session was honestly eye-opening! I never realized how much time I was wasting on formatting until now.

Certification Courses Mastering Microsoft Word for Legal Work

Really practical and focused on what lawyers actually need… I can already see how it’ll save hours in my daily work.

Certification Courses Mastering Microsoft Word for Legal Work

The trainer made even the technical tools so easy to understand… and I loved how they used real pleading examples.

Certification Courses Mastering Microsoft Word for Legal Work

Very relevant for lawyers and interns alike… it bridges the tech gap we all face while working on documents.

Certification Courses Mastering Microsoft Word for Legal Work

A concise and super useful masterclass… I now feel confident managing citations, templates, and formatting with ease.