Manupatra Academy

Explore. Learn. Upskill. All Things Law

Courses, Cases, Research, and Resources in One Place

New

Internships

Opportunities : Playbook : Videos

Learn More

Law Notes (1^st - 5^th Year)

Structured notes with flashcards to help law students grasp core subjects quickly.

Know More

Manupatra Certified Legal Research Program

Module-based learning : Legal research skills : Certification test

Learn More

Courses

Structured learning : Practice-oriented modules : Different stages of legal practice

Learn More

News and Recent Judgment Gist (BETA)

News
Gist

1. KPTCL cracks down on 45 self-execution projects violating power rules

KPTCL cracks down on 45 self-execution projects violating power rules

KPTCL cracks down on 45 self-execution projects violating power rules Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited (KPTCL) has identified 45 cases and served notices to large housing or commercial establishments for failing to complete the mandatory electrical infrastructure within the stipulated timeline under self execution projects or have violated the provisions of the Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission (KERC). A release on Friday stated that a penalty of 10% will be imposed in accordance with the applicable KERC regulations for violations. Wherever the mandatory electrical infrastructure is not completed within the stipulated timeline and such non-compliance results in transmission constraints at KPTCL sub-stations, appropriate action, including disconnection of electricity supply, may be initiated in accordance with the applicable legal and regulatory provisions to safeguard reliable power supply to the general public, it added. George said, “Under the KERC regulations dated January 12, 2006, Clause 3.2.4 (Self-Execution of Substations), projects with a sanctioned load exceeding 7.5 MVA are required to establish dedicated electrical infrastructure, including sub-stations and associated electrical facilities, at their own cost before availing permanent power supply.” He also noted that adequate time has already been provided for compliance to these self-execution projects. “However, where projects continue to disregard the regulatory requirements, necessary legal action will be initiated in accordance with the directions of Chief Minister D.K. The objective of the self-execution framework is to ensure that the required electrical infrastructure is developed simultaneously with large residential and commercial developments.

2. Exclusive: CJI Surya Kant clarifies 'cockroach' remark, calls for protocol on reporting oral court observations

Exclusive: CJI Surya Kant clarifies 'cockroach' remark, calls for protocol on reporting oral court observations

Exclusive: CJI Surya Kant clarifies 'cockroach' remark, calls for protocol on reporting oral court observations The "cockroach" remark has become one of the most significant judicial observations of recent months, triggering criticism, social media outrage and accusations that the Chief Justice of India (CJI) had targeted the country's youth. In an exclusive conversation with 's Debayan Roy, the Chief Justice says that the observation was made during a discussion on lawyers who had entered the profession using fake or unrecognised law degrees, and not about students or young people. He also speaks at length about another controversy surrounding the reporting of his oral remarks during mentionings, explains why he believes those observations were taken out of context and calls for a protocol governing how oral court proceedings are reported. CJI Surya Kant: You see, whenever mentioning takes place, the Registry informs me about the matters that have been filed in the Supreme Court and are seeking urgent hearing. For example, one matter may pertain to the SIR, another to a transport problem, another to a strike or something else. I had been asking them whether any petition had been filed regarding the students' agitation or the youngsters' agitation. They consistently told me that no petition had been filed in the Supreme Court. On that day also, before I sat in court, I was given the complete details.

3. Delhi High Court hears multiple PILs on Jantar Mantar protests, declines NIA probe plea

Delhi High Court hears multiple PILs on Jantar Mantar protests, declines NIA probe plea

Delhi High Court hears multiple PILs on Jantar Mantar protests, declines NIA probe plea The Delhi High Court on Friday (July 24, 2026) dealt with a series of public interest litigations (PILs) arising out of the ongoing student protests at Jantar Mantar over the alleged NEET paper leak and examination irregularities, hearing pleas ranging from demands for an NIA probe into the July 20 “Chalo Sansad” march to allegations of excessive police surveillance of protesters. Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia, however, took different approaches in the two sets of petitions. While it refused to entertain pleas seeking a National Investigation Agency (NIA) probe into the July 20 protest, it deferred consideration on a separate challenge to the alleged videography and surveillance of demonstrators after hearing extensive submissions from both sides. The court refused to entertain the PIL seeking an investigation by the NIA or any other specialised agency into the July 20 protest march organised by the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP), observing that it was for the Central government, not the court, to decide whether a case should be referred to the NIA. The petition, filed by former Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha vice-president Satish Kumar Aggarwal, alleged that the protest had resulted in violence, vandalism and damage to public property, and sought directions for registration of FIRs against those allegedly responsible. During the hearing, the Bench remarked, “There has to be an FIR, thereafter the police officer will forward it to State government and State will send it to Centre. If the Centre finds it fit then it can refer the investigation of FIR to the NIA. You are asking us to form an opinion that this is a fit case.

4. Tasmac cracks down on liquor overcharging at retail shops; third MRP violation to lead to dismissal

Tasmac cracks down on liquor overcharging at retail shops; third MRP violation to lead to dismissal

Tasmac cracks down on liquor overcharging at retail shops; third MRP violation to lead to dismissal CHENNAI: Going harder on overcharging liquor buyers beyond the maximum retail price (MRP), the Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation (TASMAC) has revised its penal action to dismiss personnel at retail vending shops if they are caught violating the MRP norms for a third time. The revised disciplinary guidelines, issued through a circular by Tasmac on Friday, follow a Madras high court order dated June 12. The new instructions replace the corporation's earlier circular issued in 2019 on action against employees selling liquor above the MRP, which was limited just to collecting penalty. However, under the revised norms, a supervisor, salesman or assistant salesman found selling liquor above the MRP for the first time will be suspended for one month without pay and fined. After the suspension, the employee must furnish a written undertaking not to repeat the offence and will be transferred, with headquarters' approval, to another low-sales retail outlet within the same district. For a second offence, the employee will be suspended for three months without pay, fined and transferred to a liquor depot in the same district, where they must work for at least three months after reinstatement. A third violation will result in suspension, issuance of a charge memo and a departmental inquiry. If the charges are proved, the employee will be dismissed from service.

5. Supreme Court seeks Centre’s response on NEET reforms

Supreme Court seeks Centre’s response on NEET reforms

Supreme Court seeks Centre’s response on NEET reforms The Supreme Court on Friday (July 24, 2026) indicated that it would closely monitor the Centre’s proposed overhaul of the National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (NEET). The court was hearing a batch of petitions filed by the Federation of All India Medical Association (FAIMA), the United Doctors Front (UDF), and others seeking to replace the National Testing Agency (NTA) with an independent statutory body to conduct the exam. Narasimha and Alok Aradhe directed the Union government to file a detailed response outlining whether it plans to transition NEET-UG to a computer-based test (CBT) and what safeguards will be implemented to protect examination data. The Bench also called out extraordinary measures, such as deploying the Indian Air Force to transport question papers of this year’s NEET examination, as temporary fixes. “We cannot let such a situation go on like this. Here, because of what had happened, you deployed the Air Force, but that is only an ad hoc arrangement, not a permanent one,” the Bench observed. The hearing came a day after Prime Minister Narendra Modi addressed the NEET paper leak controversy for the first time, announcing the creation of fast-track courts to expedite the trial of such cases amid the ongoing protests led by the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP). ‘Going 10 extra miles’ Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Union Government, submitted that the Centre was making every possible effort to address students’ concerns. “The government is going 10 extra miles as children’s problems have to be addressed... I can assure you from my personal knowledge, it is being monitored, supervised, and everything is being done at the highest executive level,” Mr.

1. Mahabanoo Contractor and Ors. vs. Kalikund Developers and Ors. (23.07.2026 - SC)(MANU/SC/0733/2026)

The Supreme Court of India addressed the dispute between Mahabanoo Contractor and others, and Kalikund Developers and others, concerning the enforcement of a Permanent Alternate Accommodation Agreemen

2. Union of India (UOI) and Ors. vs. Harbans Lal Verma (23.07.2026 - SC)(MANU/SC/0732/2026)

The Supreme Court of India addressed whether Harbans Lal Verma, a retired Mail/Express Guard, was entitled to financial upgradations under the Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (MACPS) beyond

3. Birla Corporation Limited vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors. (23.07.2026 - SC)(MANU/SC/0731/2026)

The Supreme Court of India addressed the dispute between Birla Corporation Limited and the State of Madhya Pradesh regarding the calculation of stamp duty on a mining lease agreement, specifically whe

4. Abdul Hameed vs. State of Rajasthan (21.07.2026 - SC)(MANU/SC/0723/2026)

The Supreme Court of India addressed the issue of whether Dr. Abdul Hameed received a fair trial, given he was unrepresented by counsel during proceedings, which violated his constitutional rights. Th

5. Dilip Agarwal vs. Rajshri Agarwal and Ors. (22.07.2026 - SC)(MANU/SC/0730/2026)

The Supreme Court of India addressed whether the death of Anand, allegedly occurring in Dilip Agarwal's vehicle, arose out of the use of the motor vehicle, thereby making Dilip or his insurer liable f

View More Gist.. View More News..

Law Students Hub

Notes : Flashcards : Landmark Cases & more…

Learn More

New

Legal Glossary

Complex terms decoded : Easy explanations

Learn More

On-demand Courses

Recorded classes : Comprehensive reading material :Quiz

Learn More

Self-Paced Certification

Courses to upskill or reskill

Learn More

Webinars

Recordings of experts views :Diverse topics

Learn More

Law Teachers Hub

Readings : Resources for legal educators

Learn More

Legal Posts

Explainers : Blogs : Articles : Case Analysis

Learn More

Survey Reports

AI Adoption : Technology in law

Learn More

Illustrated Cases

Legal Design : Supreme Court Cases : Multilingual Exploration

Learn More

Our Partners

Why Join Manupatra Academy

Brought to you by Manupatra the leaders in legal tech domain.

Curated Resources: A vast repository of meticulously compiled resources tailored for educators and learners.
Diverse Courses: An array of courses designed to cater to various levels of expertise, from beginners to advanced.
User-Friendly Interface: Accessible on any device, our intuitive interface ensures seamless navigation.

What Our Learners Say

User-Friendly Interface: Accessible on any device, our intuitive interface ensures seamless navigation.

Certification Courses 3-Day Civil Drafting Workshop

It was extremely beneficial and practical… really helped me understand the nuances of civil drafting and boosted my confidence in preparing real pleadings.

Certification Courses 3-Day Civil Drafting Workshop

The sessions were so insightful and well-structured… the faculty explained every concept with patience and clarity, which made learning much easier.

Certification Courses 3-Day Civil Drafting Workshop

Honestly, it was a great learning experience… the course covered everything from plaints to petitions in such a smooth and engaging way.

Certification Courses 3-Day Civil Drafting Workshop

The workshop was very hands-on and practical… I really liked the live feedback and the real examples shared during drafting exercises.

Certification Courses 3-Day Civil Drafting Workshop

Very well conducted and informative… I just wish it could’ve been a bit longer because the sessions were that helpful.

Certification Courses Mastering Microsoft Word for Legal Work

The session was honestly eye-opening! I never realized how much time I was wasting on formatting until now.

Certification Courses Mastering Microsoft Word for Legal Work

Really practical and focused on what lawyers actually need… I can already see how it’ll save hours in my daily work.

Certification Courses Mastering Microsoft Word for Legal Work

The trainer made even the technical tools so easy to understand… and I loved how they used real pleading examples.

Certification Courses Mastering Microsoft Word for Legal Work

Very relevant for lawyers and interns alike… it bridges the tech gap we all face while working on documents.

Certification Courses Mastering Microsoft Word for Legal Work

A concise and super useful masterclass… I now feel confident managing citations, templates, and formatting with ease.