Explore. Learn. Upskill. All Things Law

Courses, Cases, Research, and Resources in One Place

News and Recent Judgment Gist

  • News
  • Gist

1. ITAT Mumbai allows section 54F relief on two flats as one residential house

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, ruled in favour of a taxpayer who sold six commercial units in Mumbai for long-term capital gains of around Rs 5 crore and claimed a deduction of the

ITAT Mumbai allows section 54F relief on two flats as one residential house

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai, ruled in favour of a taxpayer who sold six commercial units in Mumbai for long-term capital gains of around Rs 5 crore and claimed a deduction of the same amount under Section 54F of the Income Tax Act after purchasing two residential flats. The flats were in the same building and wing but on different floors, and their agreements were executed and registered on the same date. The Assessing Officer allowed the claim for one flat but disallowed Rs 2,51,31,621 for the second, holding that Section 54F permitted relief for only one residential house. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, upheld that view, citing separate entrances, floors and stamp duty. The taxpayer argued the flats were acquired together as one family residence. The ITAT held that separate entrances, floors and registration documents did not by themselves prevent the flats from qualifying as one residential house under Section 54F, relying on judicial decisions including CIT v. Gita Duggal and Principal Commissioner of Income Tax v. Lata Goel. It set aside the CIT(A) order and directed the Assessing Officer to allow the section 54F deduction in accordance with law.

2. ECI assures Supreme Court left-out voters can submit Annexure A without Form 8 if shifted within State

The Election Commission of India on November 14, 2026 filed a supplementary affidavit in the Supreme Court detailing further measures to ensure that voters wrongly left out as absent, shifted, dead or

ECI assures Supreme Court left-out voters can submit Annexure A without Form 8 if shifted within State

The Election Commission of India on November 14, 2026 filed a supplementary affidavit in the Supreme Court detailing further measures to ensure that voters wrongly left out as absent, shifted, dead or duplicate from draft electoral rolls are brought back in. The ECI said directions were issued on November 6 to Chief Electoral Officers of States and Union Territories where the Special Intensive Revision was under way, allowing such voters to submit the duly filled Enumeration Form (Annexure A) to the ERO or AERO with their current ordinary residence. Electors who have not shifted may submit the signed Enumeration Form (Annexure A) with an Annexure-B statement giving the reason for earlier non-submission, in person or through family members, or online with e-sign on ECINET. Electors who have shifted within the State and were excluded from the draft roll need not submit Form 8; they may submit the Enumeration Form (Annexure A) with an Annexure-C statement giving their new address and Assembly Constituency, plus address proof, to the ERO or AERO of the new constituency. The ECI said booth-wise lists of left-out electors marked ASDD would be displayed afresh with probable reasons for non-inclusion, and Enumeration Forms would be processed under Rule 21(1) of the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960, with the same EPIC number re-assigned. Previously registered electors deleted from the draft roll who had already submitted Form 6 need not submit the Enumeration Form afresh; their applications would be processed under the November 3 clarification on re-inclusion without fear of criminal prosecution. Petitioners Anjali Bhardwaj, represented by advocates Prashant Bhushan and Neha Rathi, and Shailendra Mani Tripathi, represented by advocate Chand Qureshi, had raised apprehensions that previously registered voters excluded from the draft roll were being compelled to submit Form 6, meant for fresh voters, and argued that such false declarations were criminally prosecutable under Section 31 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950. The ECI also said a mechanism had been directed to ensure no elector was deprived of the opportunity to get their name included in the final electoral roll, subject to eligibility conditions, while avoiding duplication. It noted that after a new Deputy Election Commissioner joined on November 2, a November 4 work order partially modified the September 23 order and allocated oversight of the ECI IT Division to a senior DEC, with the DG (IT) to put up files through the senior DEC before the Commission.

3. Bombay High Court dismisses EuroChem appeal in ₹19,500-crore Tecnimont decree suit

A division bench of the Bombay High Court, comprising Justices Bharati Dangre and Manjusha Deshpande, on October 29 dismissed EuroChem North-West-2’s appeal against a single judge’s June 8 order refus

Bombay High Court dismisses EuroChem appeal in ₹19,500-crore Tecnimont decree suit

A division bench of the Bombay High Court, comprising Justices Bharati Dangre and Manjusha Deshpande, on October 29 dismissed EuroChem North-West-2’s appeal against a single judge’s June 8 order refusing to freeze Tecnimont S.p.A.’s Indian assets in a ₹19,500-crore foreign decree enforcement suit. The bench upheld the denial of interim relief and rejected EuroChem’s stay request. The dispute arose from three June 2020 contracts to build a fertiliser complex in Russia’s Leningrad Region, which required London-seated ICC arbitration under English law. After EU and UK sanctions hit EuroChem’s beneficial owner Andrey Melnichenko in 2022, Tecnimont and MT Russia suspended work; EuroChem terminated the contracts and pursued ICC arbitration for three years. EuroChem lost a performance bond case in London in July 2025 and then invoked Article 248.1 of Russia’s Arbitrazh Procedural Code; in December 2025 it obtained a 171.11-billion-rouble Moscow Commercial Court decree against Tecnimont and MT Russia. EuroChem filed the Mumbai recovery suit, saying Russia is a non-reciprocating territory, and sought an immediate freeze on Tecnimont’s Indian assets, invoking sections 13 and 14 CPC and arguing for a mandatory presumption of jurisdiction rebuttable only at trial. The division bench held that courts can examine prima facie doubts over a foreign court’s competence under Section 13 CPC before trial, that the presumption of competence can be rebutted at the interim stage, and that accepting EuroChem’s argument would mean interim relief automatically flows in every case involving a foreign judgment. It declined to stay the verdict. Senior advocate Zal Andhyarujina appeared for EuroChem, and senior advocate Vikram Nankani appeared for Tecnimont.

4. Karnataka High Court quashes Section 309 IPC case against CISF sub-inspector, calls for mental health policy review

The High Court of Karnataka, with Justice Suraj Govindaraj, quashed the criminal proceedings against a 37-year-old CISF Sub-Inspector who attempted to end her life in 2022 while on duty in Mangaluru u

Karnataka High Court quashes Section 309 IPC case against CISF sub-inspector, calls for mental health policy review

The High Court of Karnataka, with Justice Suraj Govindaraj, quashed the criminal proceedings against a 37-year-old CISF Sub-Inspector who attempted to end her life in 2022 while on duty in Mangaluru using her service pistol. The court set aside the lower court’s order and discharged her from the offence under Section 309 of the IPC (attempt to commit suicide). It ruled that Section 115 of the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017, creates a mandatory presumption of severe stress and places the burden on the prosecution to prove otherwise; since no such evidence was produced, continuing the trial would be an abuse of the judicial process. The court also advised security and police organisations to prioritise personnel mental health and well-being, examine existing policies, ensure accessible and confidential counselling, professional mental healthcare and timely treatment, sensitise commanding and supervisory officers to signs of distress, and provide rehabilitation and return-to-duty support based on professional assessment.

5. Delhi court rejects bail pleas of D. Manoranjan, Sagar Sharma in 2023 Parliament security breach case

Special Judge Kiran Bansal of a Delhi court dismissed, for the second time, the regular bail pleas of D. Manoranjan and Sagar Sharma in the December 2023 Parliament security breach case, in an order p

Delhi court rejects bail pleas of D. Manoranjan, Sagar Sharma in 2023 Parliament security breach case

Special Judge Kiran Bansal of a Delhi court dismissed, for the second time, the regular bail pleas of D. Manoranjan and Sagar Sharma in the December 2023 Parliament security breach case, in an order passed on Friday (November 13, 2026). The accused sought bail citing long incarceration and parity with co-accused Neelam Raoliya, alias Neelam Azad, and Mahesh Kumawat, who were granted bail by the Delhi High Court on July 2, 2025. The judge held that the statutory bar on bail under Section 43D(5) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act applied, finding reasonable grounds to believe the accusations against the accused were prima facie true. The court said parity was not available to the two accused because the High Court had noted that Raoliya stayed outside Parliament and Kumawat was not in Delhi that day, whereas Manoranjan and Sharma had entered the main Parliament and jumped from the public gallery to the main hall of the Lok Sabha, and canisters were concealed in their shoes and parliamentary proceedings were disrupted. The court described the allegations as grave and serious, noted the alleged choice of the anniversary of the 2001 Parliament attack, and referred to the allegation that the accused erased data from their phones and handed the devices to co-accused Lalit Jha for destruction. The judge said bail cannot be granted solely on the ground of delay and said nothing observed in the order would affect the merits of the case. Six persons are accused in the case: Manoranjan, Sharma, Amol Dhanraj Shinde, Raoliya, Jha and Kumawat.

Our Partners

gnlu nlud silf rvu gcai lti CubeRoots civis justiceadda manipal Lawctopus

Why Join Manupatra Academy

Brought to you by Manupatra the leaders in legal tech domain.

  • Curated Resources: A vast repository of meticulously compiled resources tailored for educators and learners.
  • Diverse Courses: An array of courses designed to cater to various levels of expertise, from beginners to advanced.
  • User-Friendly Interface: Accessible on any device, our intuitive interface ensures seamless navigation.

What Our Learners Say

User-Friendly Interface: Accessible on any device, our intuitive interface ensures seamless navigation.

Certification Courses 3-Day Civil Drafting Workshop

It was extremely beneficial and practical… really helped me understand the nuances of civil drafting and boosted my confidence in preparing real pleadings.

Certification Courses 3-Day Civil Drafting Workshop

The sessions were so insightful and well-structured… the faculty explained every concept with patience and clarity, which made learning much easier.

Certification Courses 3-Day Civil Drafting Workshop

Honestly, it was a great learning experience… the course covered everything from plaints to petitions in such a smooth and engaging way.

Certification Courses 3-Day Civil Drafting Workshop

The workshop was very hands-on and practical… I really liked the live feedback and the real examples shared during drafting exercises.

Certification Courses 3-Day Civil Drafting Workshop

Very well conducted and informative… I just wish it could’ve been a bit longer because the sessions were that helpful.

Certification Courses Mastering Microsoft Word for Legal Work

The session was honestly eye-opening! I never realized how much time I was wasting on formatting until now.

Certification Courses Mastering Microsoft Word for Legal Work

Really practical and focused on what lawyers actually need… I can already see how it’ll save hours in my daily work.

Certification Courses Mastering Microsoft Word for Legal Work

The trainer made even the technical tools so easy to understand… and I loved how they used real pleading examples.

Certification Courses Mastering Microsoft Word for Legal Work

Very relevant for lawyers and interns alike… it bridges the tech gap we all face while working on documents.

Certification Courses Mastering Microsoft Word for Legal Work

A concise and super useful masterclass… I now feel confident managing citations, templates, and formatting with ease.

Certification Courses A Practical Guide to Legal Documents in PE & VC Transactions

Extremely helpful in breaking down complicated clauses into simple, understandable parts.

Certification Courses A Practical Guide to Legal Documents in PE & VC Transactions

The course made PE & VC documentation so much less intimidating… the examples were absolutely spot on.

Certification Courses A Practical Guide to Legal Documents in PE & VC Transactions

It was the perfect blend of law and business… I finally understood how term sheets and SHA clauses actually work in practice.

Certification Courses A Practical Guide to Legal Documents in PE & VC Transactions

The speaker explained complex transactional terms beautifully… it’s a must for anyone getting into corporate law.

Certification Courses A Practical Guide to Legal Documents in PE & VC Transactions

Engaging, clear, and full of practical insights… exactly what I needed to feel more confident while drafting investment documents.

Certification Courses Online Summer School: Commercial Litigation – Foundations of Commercial Litigation and Corporate Disputes

The coursework was extremely detailed and well-structured… the lectures and guest sessions were really insightful, and the quizzes made learning fun.

Certification Courses Online Summer School: Commercial Litigation – Foundations of Commercial Litigation and Corporate Disputes

The faculty explained even complex litigation concepts so clearly… and the real-life examples made everything easy to connect with.

Certification Courses Online Summer School: Commercial Litigation – Foundations of Commercial Litigation and Corporate Disputes

It was such an enriching course… the mix of theory and practical drafting exercises really helped strengthen my foundation in commercial disputes.

Certification Courses Online Summer School: Commercial Litigation – Foundations of Commercial Litigation and Corporate Disputes

Very informative and engaging throughout… the faculty and coordinator were so supportive and made sure every doubt was cleared.

Certification Courses Online Summer School: Commercial Litigation – Foundations of Commercial Litigation and Corporate Disputes

The course had a perfect balance between procedure and strategy… and honestly, I feel much more confident in handling commercial matters now.

Certification Courses Online Summer School: Commercial Litigation – Financial, Regulatory and Advanced Litigation Strategies

The speaker is honestly on another level… her way of simplifying complex litigation topics was just unmatched.

Certification Courses Online Summer School: Commercial Litigation – Financial, Regulatory and Advanced Litigation Strategies

The course was so detailed and well structured… I’ve genuinely learned a lot about financial and regulatory disputes.

Certification Courses Online Summer School: Commercial Litigation – Financial, Regulatory and Advanced Litigation Strategies

Extremely engaging! The real-world examples and case discussions made every class interesting and relatable.

Certification Courses Online Summer School: Commercial Litigation – Financial, Regulatory and Advanced Litigation Strategies

Very interactive and clear… all our doubts were patiently answered, and each session felt like solid progress.

Certification Courses Online Summer School: Commercial Litigation – Financial, Regulatory and Advanced Litigation Strategies

The best part was how it balanced theory and strategy… it truly enhanced my understanding of commercial litigation practice.