Explore. Learn. Upskill. All Things Law

Courses, Cases, Research, and Resources in One Place

News and Recent Judgment Gist

  • News
  • Gist

1. Supreme Court directs Centre to set up special cell to monitor amended child labour law

The Supreme Court directed the Centre to constitute a special cell to monitor implementation of the Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Amendment Act, 2016, and directed the Ministry of Women an

Supreme Court directs Centre to set up special cell to monitor amended child labour law

The Supreme Court directed the Centre to constitute a special cell to monitor implementation of the Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Amendment Act, 2016, and directed the Ministry of Women and Child Development to issue instructions to enforcement agencies through the chief secretaries of the states. A bench of Justices SVN Bhatti and NV Anjaria said the 2016 amendment, which bars child labour in hazardous industries and prohibits employment of children below 14 in all occupations and processes, should be given complete and full effect. The court was hearing a 2009 petition by NGO Health For Millions, which had challenged the constitutional validity of a proviso to Section 3 of the Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986. That provision allowed children to be employed in hazardous beedi rolling in workshops as family labour and in government-aided or government-funded schools, and the petition also sought educational facilities and two midday meals for such child workers. The Centre told the bench that the 2016 amendment had substantially addressed the petitioner’s grievance and the petition no longer required consideration. The court said the prayer in the writ petition did not survive for further consideration, but it took note of amendment Act No. 35 of 2016 and said respondents must ensure complete and strict compliance with the Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986, including the amended provisions, through a special monitoring cell and state enforcement agencies, according to Press Trust of India.

2. Supreme Court upholds states' power to levy additional tax on sales tax under pre-GST regime

The Supreme Court's seven-judge Constitution Bench, headed by Chief Justice Surya Kant, upheld the 1974 judgment in S. Kodar vs State of Kerala and held that an additional tax, surcharge or cess calcu

Supreme Court upholds states' power to levy additional tax on sales tax under pre-GST regime

The Supreme Court's seven-judge Constitution Bench, headed by Chief Justice Surya Kant, upheld the 1974 judgment in S. Kodar vs State of Kerala and held that an additional tax, surcharge or cess calculated as a percentage of sales tax payable by a dealer is an increase in the sales-tax rate under Entry 54 of the State List for the pre-GST regime. The ruling settled a reference pending since 1998, arising from Arjun Flour Mills vs State of Orissa and uncertainty after India Cements vs State of Tamil Nadu (1990). The Bench said there was no conflict between S. Kodar and Hoechst Pharmaceuticals (1983), and Justice K.V. Viswanathan concurred that S. Kodar required no reconsideration. The court observed the broader reference had become academic after GST was introduced in 2017. The Centre, represented by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, argued that GST replaced the earlier sales-tax framework and indicated only limited pending cases could be affected.

3. Supreme Court seeks Centre, EC reply on challenge to Section 16 immunity for Election Commissioners

The Supreme Court on November 4, 2026, issued notice to the Union government and the Election Commission of India on petitions challenging Section 16 of The Chief Election Commissioner And Other Elect

Supreme Court seeks Centre, EC reply on challenge to Section 16 immunity for Election Commissioners

The Supreme Court on November 4, 2026, issued notice to the Union government and the Election Commission of India on petitions challenging Section 16 of The Chief Election Commissioner And Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions Of Service And Term Of Office) Act, 2023. A Bench headed by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant sought their responses and listed the petitions on December 18. The petitioners, including RJD MP Manoj Jha, contend that Section 16 is unconstitutional because it grants the Chief Election Commissioner and Election Commissioners blanket, lifelong immunity from civil or criminal proceedings, which, according to the petitions, bars all kinds of prosecution including corruption and forgery, as well as defamation and contempt proceedings. They submit that this interferes with judicial review, violates the Basic Structure, fails the proportionality test, and breaches Articles 14 and 21. They also note that no such blanket immunity existed before the 2023 Act and that Article 361 immunity for the President and Governors is not absolute.

4. Supreme Court holds additional sales tax reference academic after GST, says S. Kodar holds

A seven-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court, headed by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, held that the reference concerning the power of States to impose additional sales tax or surcharge c

Supreme Court holds additional sales tax reference academic after GST, says S. Kodar holds

A seven-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court, headed by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, held that the reference concerning the power of States to impose additional sales tax or surcharge calculated on existing sales tax had become academic after the introduction of the Goods and Services Tax regime in 2017. The Court clarified that an additional tax or surcharge calculated as a percentage of the sales tax payable by a dealer amounts to an enhancement of the sales tax rate and falls within the States' legislative competence under the erstwhile Entry 54 of List II of the Seventh Schedule. It further clarified that the five-judge Constitution Bench ruling in S. Kodar v. State of Kerala continues to hold the field. The reference arose from Arjun Flour Mills v. State of Odisha, which challenged Section 5A of the Odisha Sales Tax Act, 1947. That provision imposed additional tax at 10% on dealers with annual turnover between Rs 10 lakh and Rs 1 crore, and 15% on dealers with annual turnover exceeding Rs 1 crore. The central question was whether States could impose such a levy under Entry 54 of List II or whether it amounted to a tax on income under Entry 82 of List I. The matter was referred to a larger Bench in 1999 following an apparent conflict between earlier Supreme Court decisions. The Court said India Cement Ltd. v. State of Tamil Nadu dealt with a different legislative field and did not establish that a levy calculated as a percentage of another tax would automatically fall outside the State's legislative competence, and noted that the premise in India Cement that royalty constitutes a tax was overruled by the nine-judge Bench in Mineral Area Development Authority v. Steel Authority of India. In a concurring opinion, Justice K.V. Viswanathan held that S. Kodar was correctly decided and continues to remain good law, and found no conflict between Kodar and Hoechst Pharmaceuticals. The Bench left open issues concerning the validity of a surcharge under the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948, on industrial units otherwise exempted from sales tax, and the transfer of cess proceeds under the Punjab Social Security Act, 2000, directly to the State Social Security Fund without first crediting them to the Consolidated Fund of the State under Article 266. The Registry was directed to place the lead matter and connected cases before an appropriate regular Bench for disposal in accordance with the observations.

5. Delhi High Court: Anjana Om Kashyap settles with Khan sir; 4 PM News mediation to continue

Journalist Anjana Om Kashyap and coaching teacher Faisal Khan, known as Khan sir, reached a settlement in Kashyap's defamation suit before the Delhi High Court, along with five other defendants, advoc

Delhi High Court: Anjana Om Kashyap settles with Khan sir; 4 PM News mediation to continue

Journalist Anjana Om Kashyap and coaching teacher Faisal Khan, known as Khan sir, reached a settlement in Kashyap's defamation suit before the Delhi High Court, along with five other defendants, advocate Vrinda Bhandari told Justice Tushar Rao Gedela. The other defendants were Babita Tyagi, Arvind Bhadauriya, Manish Yadav, and X account operators SamKhasa and Abhimanyu1305. Bhandari said the settlement agreement would be signed in a few days and sought time to bring it on record. Mediation with defendant 8, 4 PM News, failed, and settlement talks with defendant 2, Abhinay Sharma, remained pending. The court told counsel for 4 PM News that its journalist's remarks were not mere reporting but personal opinion that Kashyap was saying "fake news ki dukaan," and asked Kashyap and 4 PM News to make one more attempt at mediation through mediator Senior Advocate Rajshekhar Rao. The court recorded its appreciation for Rao and listed the matter for December 15. Kashyap and TV Today Network had sought removal of allegedly defamatory comments such as "bikau partaker", "chatukar", "dalaali" and "fake news dukaan" made by Khan sir regarding her coverage on "star teachers"; the controversy arose from a live debate on the NEET exam system. The Rs. 2 crore defamation suit sought removal of allegedly defamatory material from social media platforms.

Our Partners

gnlu nlud silf rvu gcai lti CubeRoots civis justiceadda manipal Lawctopus

Why Join Manupatra Academy

Brought to you by Manupatra the leaders in legal tech domain.

  • Curated Resources: A vast repository of meticulously compiled resources tailored for educators and learners.
  • Diverse Courses: An array of courses designed to cater to various levels of expertise, from beginners to advanced.
  • User-Friendly Interface: Accessible on any device, our intuitive interface ensures seamless navigation.

What Our Learners Say

User-Friendly Interface: Accessible on any device, our intuitive interface ensures seamless navigation.

Certification Courses 3-Day Civil Drafting Workshop

It was extremely beneficial and practical… really helped me understand the nuances of civil drafting and boosted my confidence in preparing real pleadings.

Certification Courses 3-Day Civil Drafting Workshop

The sessions were so insightful and well-structured… the faculty explained every concept with patience and clarity, which made learning much easier.

Certification Courses 3-Day Civil Drafting Workshop

Honestly, it was a great learning experience… the course covered everything from plaints to petitions in such a smooth and engaging way.

Certification Courses 3-Day Civil Drafting Workshop

The workshop was very hands-on and practical… I really liked the live feedback and the real examples shared during drafting exercises.

Certification Courses 3-Day Civil Drafting Workshop

Very well conducted and informative… I just wish it could’ve been a bit longer because the sessions were that helpful.

Certification Courses Mastering Microsoft Word for Legal Work

The session was honestly eye-opening! I never realized how much time I was wasting on formatting until now.

Certification Courses Mastering Microsoft Word for Legal Work

Really practical and focused on what lawyers actually need… I can already see how it’ll save hours in my daily work.

Certification Courses Mastering Microsoft Word for Legal Work

The trainer made even the technical tools so easy to understand… and I loved how they used real pleading examples.

Certification Courses Mastering Microsoft Word for Legal Work

Very relevant for lawyers and interns alike… it bridges the tech gap we all face while working on documents.

Certification Courses Mastering Microsoft Word for Legal Work

A concise and super useful masterclass… I now feel confident managing citations, templates, and formatting with ease.

Certification Courses A Practical Guide to Legal Documents in PE & VC Transactions

Extremely helpful in breaking down complicated clauses into simple, understandable parts.

Certification Courses A Practical Guide to Legal Documents in PE & VC Transactions

The course made PE & VC documentation so much less intimidating… the examples were absolutely spot on.

Certification Courses A Practical Guide to Legal Documents in PE & VC Transactions

It was the perfect blend of law and business… I finally understood how term sheets and SHA clauses actually work in practice.

Certification Courses A Practical Guide to Legal Documents in PE & VC Transactions

The speaker explained complex transactional terms beautifully… it’s a must for anyone getting into corporate law.

Certification Courses A Practical Guide to Legal Documents in PE & VC Transactions

Engaging, clear, and full of practical insights… exactly what I needed to feel more confident while drafting investment documents.

Certification Courses Online Summer School: Commercial Litigation – Foundations of Commercial Litigation and Corporate Disputes

The coursework was extremely detailed and well-structured… the lectures and guest sessions were really insightful, and the quizzes made learning fun.

Certification Courses Online Summer School: Commercial Litigation – Foundations of Commercial Litigation and Corporate Disputes

The faculty explained even complex litigation concepts so clearly… and the real-life examples made everything easy to connect with.

Certification Courses Online Summer School: Commercial Litigation – Foundations of Commercial Litigation and Corporate Disputes

It was such an enriching course… the mix of theory and practical drafting exercises really helped strengthen my foundation in commercial disputes.

Certification Courses Online Summer School: Commercial Litigation – Foundations of Commercial Litigation and Corporate Disputes

Very informative and engaging throughout… the faculty and coordinator were so supportive and made sure every doubt was cleared.

Certification Courses Online Summer School: Commercial Litigation – Foundations of Commercial Litigation and Corporate Disputes

The course had a perfect balance between procedure and strategy… and honestly, I feel much more confident in handling commercial matters now.

Certification Courses Online Summer School: Commercial Litigation – Financial, Regulatory and Advanced Litigation Strategies

The speaker is honestly on another level… her way of simplifying complex litigation topics was just unmatched.

Certification Courses Online Summer School: Commercial Litigation – Financial, Regulatory and Advanced Litigation Strategies

The course was so detailed and well structured… I’ve genuinely learned a lot about financial and regulatory disputes.

Certification Courses Online Summer School: Commercial Litigation – Financial, Regulatory and Advanced Litigation Strategies

Extremely engaging! The real-world examples and case discussions made every class interesting and relatable.

Certification Courses Online Summer School: Commercial Litigation – Financial, Regulatory and Advanced Litigation Strategies

Very interactive and clear… all our doubts were patiently answered, and each session felt like solid progress.

Certification Courses Online Summer School: Commercial Litigation – Financial, Regulatory and Advanced Litigation Strategies

The best part was how it balanced theory and strategy… it truly enhanced my understanding of commercial litigation practice.