Explore. Learn. Upskill. All Things Law

Courses, Cases, Research, and Resources in One Place

News and Recent Judgment Gist

  • News
  • Gist

1. CBI questions actor Urmila Sanwvar for four hours in Saharanpur in Ankita Bhandari murder case

A Central Bureau of Investigation team returned to Saharanpur on Sunday and questioned actor Urmila Sanwvar for about four hours in connection with the Ankita Bhandari murder case. The case drew atten

CBI questions actor Urmila Sanwvar for four hours in Saharanpur in Ankita Bhandari murder case

A Central Bureau of Investigation team returned to Saharanpur on Sunday and questioned actor Urmila Sanwvar for about four hours in connection with the Ankita Bhandari murder case. The case drew attention after Sanwvar circulated audio and video on social media and claimed that a VIP was involved in the murder; the CBI is now examining those claims and related facts. The CBI team had also gone to Govindnagar in Saharanpur on Saturday, but could not question her because she was in Delhi. She had said she was going with Ankita Bhandari's parents to submit a memorandum to the President. The team returned after telling a caretaker at her home to come again on Monday. On Sunday, the CBI team reached her residence around 2 pm and questioned her for about four hours on various points. The questioning for a second consecutive day is seen as an effort to connect links in the facts and evidence of the case. Sanwvar alleged that the CBI team came to her with half-complete questions, and said she had answered whatever questions were asked.

2. Karnataka Cabinet to decide this month on land for new High Court building, says Chief Minister D.K. Shivakumar

Chief Minister D.K. Shivakumar said the State Cabinet will decide later this month on allocating land for the new building of the High Court of Karnataka "on the Race Course premises". He was speaking

Karnataka Cabinet to decide this month on land for new High Court building, says Chief Minister D.K. Shivakumar

Chief Minister D.K. Shivakumar said the State Cabinet will decide later this month on allocating land for the new building of the High Court of Karnataka "on the Race Course premises". He was speaking at the foundation stone laying ceremony of the NLSIU South Campus at Nagarbhavi in Bengaluru on Saturday. Shivakumar said he had been receiving requests from the Chief Justice of the High Court of Karnataka for an alternate building, and noted that it is the only High Court in India that faces the legislature house. He said the government would speed up the process of land allocation for the new building, which he said would come up on 12-15 acres, and added that he wished Justice Surya Kant would also lay the foundation stone for the new building by the end of his tenure. In response to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL), the Karnataka Government had filed an affidavit in July, 2026, informing the High Court that it would soon pass a resolution allocating the Bangalore Turf Club (BTC) land for construction of a new high court building. Earlier in the year, in February, 2026, the Cabinet had approved the relocation plan of BTC races to Kunigal Stud Farm in Tumakuru, and BTC has also agreed to shift its operations and racing out of the city, sources said. The Chief Minister laid the foundation stone for the new NLSIU South Campus, to be built on 7 acres of land allotted by the Karnataka Government, comprising 2000 student rooms and 90 units of faculty and staff residences, with NLSIU also planning a new auditorium, student centre and research facilities on its existing campus site. Shivakumar also announced that the government will start a coaching institute to provide training for judicial service examinations to law graduates and offer continuing education for young lawyers, saying that while there were many coaching institutes for other entrance exams, there were none for law aspirants. Addressing students graduating from the National Law School of India University, Bengaluru, in the presence of Chief Justice of India Surya Kant on October 17, 2026, Saturday, the Chief Minister exhorted them to "never stop questioning", warning that if students do not question, it will pave an easy way for people in power or others to decide for them. He said a robust democracy must provide citizens with the opportunity to question the government and that young lawyers and policymakers bear a special responsibility to protect the Constitution at a time when democratic institutions across the world are facing challenges. Manhar Bansal, a BA LLB (Hons) graduate, received 15 gold medals for his academic achievements at NLSIU, is the best outgoing undergraduate student and secured first rank in the University and in various individual subjects; in November 2025 he was awarded the Rhodes Scholarship for India 2026 and is currently pursuing Master of Studies in Comparative Literature and Critical Translation at Oxford University in the UK. He said he chose to pursue law out of a fascination with the humanities and social sciences, described his days at NLSIU as the most transformational years of his academic and personal life, and said he intends to pursue a PhD in Comparative Literature and work towards a public-facing academic career.

3. Bail hearing for CJP functionaries Das and Ranka deferred after magistrate recuses citing threat to life

The bail hearing of Cockroach Janta Party functionaries Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka was put off on Sunday after the special executive magistrate failed to arrive at the scheduled time and later recu

Bail hearing for CJP functionaries Das and Ranka deferred after magistrate recuses citing threat to life

The bail hearing of Cockroach Janta Party functionaries Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka was put off on Sunday after the special executive magistrate failed to arrive at the scheduled time and later recused himself citing a threat to his life. Delhi police registered a case in connection with the alleged threat. Police sources said the SEM had been pressured to release Ranka and Das without delay. CJP argued that the alleged threat was a separate complaint and suggested that police examine call detail records to ascertain whether the SEM’s number had been shared from a CJP member’s device. The magistrate declined. Das and Ranka were sent to five days of judicial custody on Oct 14 after they entered Jantar Mantar, which had been denotified as a designated protest site, by breaching barricades. CJP alleged delay in the bail hearing, and the outfit’s legal head Ratna Singh also said four sureties had been rejected on vague grounds. She posted on X that she had been at the police station since 11am for the hearing, which was scheduled for noon, but the assistant commissioner of police, who also functions as the SEM, arrived around 5.30pm. Advocate Abhist Hela said no specific statutory provision was cited to reschedule the hearing, with the decision resting on concerns for judicial officers’ safety, among others. A police officer said someone tried to influence the SEM and he recused himself from the hearing, asking how he could hear the case under such threatening circumstances. The case has been registered under the provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for alleged criminal intimidation and threatening a public servant.

4. NGT restrains tree felling for Hebbal Short Tunnel Project until matter disposed of, next hearing December 15

The National Green Tribunal (NGT) on Friday issued an order restraining the felling of trees for the Hebbal Short Tunnel Project until the hearing is completed and the matter is disposed of. The order

NGT restrains tree felling for Hebbal Short Tunnel Project until matter disposed of, next hearing December 15

The National Green Tribunal (NGT) on Friday issued an order restraining the felling of trees for the Hebbal Short Tunnel Project until the hearing is completed and the matter is disposed of. The order states: "There should not be any cutting of trees, be it in any area of the Hebbal Short Tunnel Project till the matter is disposed of." The tribunal scheduled the next hearing for December 15, meaning the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) cannot cut any trees along the Hebbal Short Tunnel alignment until mid-December. The order followed a petition filed by a civic group, after the NGT had taken suo motu cognisance of a report in dated September 24 on the BDA's proposal to remove trees for the project. The report was titled "Over 70 tree species among 1,128 marked for felling for Hebbal tunnel project in Bengaluru". In the suo motu case, the Karnataka government submitted a representation stating that writ petitions concerning the matter were pending before the High Court, where the Advocate-General had given an undertaking that no trees would be cut until the matter was disposed of. The NGT then disposed of the original suo motu case. However, Aranya, Parisara Mathu Havamana Badalavane, Sangha, Mangaluru, noticed a discrepancy and filed another application seeking a restraining order. The group pointed out that the undertaking given by the Advocate-General before the Karnataka High Court, as stated during the suo motu hearing, pertained to a different area, Lalbagh, though it concerned the same project. The NGT order said the original application in general covers the entire project and the felling of trees for the same. Counsel representing the government also clarified that the undertaking pertained to a different area, after which the NGT passed the Friday order. Meanwhile, BDA Chairman N. A. Haris told that the BDA does not intend to fell all 1,128 trees but plans to translocate 1,072 trees and axe the remaining ones. The public notice issued by the Greater Bengaluru Authority (GBA) refers to the "removal" of trees along Hebbal Main Road for the 2.3-km twin tunnel project. Civic groups opposing the short tunnel project argue that the BDA cannot announce such a decision, as it can be taken only by the Tree Expert Committee.

5. First-tier Tribunal grants adverse possession over 48cm strip under Surbiton kitchen extension

The First-tier Tribunal has ruled in favour of Mina Sharma and Neil Deeley in a boundary dispute with their neighbours Susannah and Chris James over a 48-centimetre strip of land in Cottage Grove, Sur

First-tier Tribunal grants adverse possession over 48cm strip under Surbiton kitchen extension

The First-tier Tribunal has ruled in favour of Mina Sharma and Neil Deeley in a boundary dispute with their neighbours Susannah and Chris James over a 48-centimetre strip of land in Cottage Grove, Surbiton, London. Susannah James bought her £600,000 semi-detached house in 2021 and a year later claimed that part of the adjoining property's single-storey kitchen extension had been built across the boundary onto her land. She and her husband asked Judge Ewan Paton to declare that the section of the neighbours' kitchen was trespassing and to order its demolition. The homes were once a single Victorian property later divided into two semi-detached houses. The boundary follows the garden fence line, but the roof line shows the neighbours' kitchen steps across the boundary by 48 centimetres, a discrepancy reportedly unnoticed for around 40 years because thick vegetation obscured the border. The extension is believed to have been built in the early 1980s, before Sharma and Deeley bought their home in 2012, and evidence from a previous joint owner indicated it had been in the same position since at least 2000. Sharma and Deeley did not dispute the original boundary line but claimed adverse possession, or squatters' rights, over the strip. Judge Paton described the evidence as overwhelming that the kitchen had remained in place for well over two decades before the dispute, and said building and enjoying part of a house on neighbouring land was possibly the plainest example of factual possession combined with an intention to possess. He found the neighbours had been in adverse possession since at least October 2000. He also noted that Ordnance Survey and Land Registry index maps can contain kinks, curves and steps, that buyers cannot reasonably be expected to spot every minor discrepancy, and that a purchaser is entitled to assume what they see is what they get. The tribunal approved the adverse possession application, meaning the Jameses cannot force removal or demolition of the disputed section of kitchen.

Our Partners

gnlu nlud silf rvu gcai lti CubeRoots civis justiceadda manipal Lawctopus

Why Join Manupatra Academy

Brought to you by Manupatra the leaders in legal tech domain.

  • Curated Resources: A vast repository of meticulously compiled resources tailored for educators and learners.
  • Diverse Courses: An array of courses designed to cater to various levels of expertise, from beginners to advanced.
  • User-Friendly Interface: Accessible on any device, our intuitive interface ensures seamless navigation.

What Our Learners Say

User-Friendly Interface: Accessible on any device, our intuitive interface ensures seamless navigation.

Certification Courses 3-Day Civil Drafting Workshop

It was extremely beneficial and practical… really helped me understand the nuances of civil drafting and boosted my confidence in preparing real pleadings.

Certification Courses 3-Day Civil Drafting Workshop

The sessions were so insightful and well-structured… the faculty explained every concept with patience and clarity, which made learning much easier.

Certification Courses 3-Day Civil Drafting Workshop

Honestly, it was a great learning experience… the course covered everything from plaints to petitions in such a smooth and engaging way.

Certification Courses 3-Day Civil Drafting Workshop

The workshop was very hands-on and practical… I really liked the live feedback and the real examples shared during drafting exercises.

Certification Courses 3-Day Civil Drafting Workshop

Very well conducted and informative… I just wish it could’ve been a bit longer because the sessions were that helpful.

Certification Courses Mastering Microsoft Word for Legal Work

The session was honestly eye-opening! I never realized how much time I was wasting on formatting until now.

Certification Courses Mastering Microsoft Word for Legal Work

Really practical and focused on what lawyers actually need… I can already see how it’ll save hours in my daily work.

Certification Courses Mastering Microsoft Word for Legal Work

The trainer made even the technical tools so easy to understand… and I loved how they used real pleading examples.

Certification Courses Mastering Microsoft Word for Legal Work

Very relevant for lawyers and interns alike… it bridges the tech gap we all face while working on documents.

Certification Courses Mastering Microsoft Word for Legal Work

A concise and super useful masterclass… I now feel confident managing citations, templates, and formatting with ease.

Certification Courses A Practical Guide to Legal Documents in PE & VC Transactions

Extremely helpful in breaking down complicated clauses into simple, understandable parts.

Certification Courses A Practical Guide to Legal Documents in PE & VC Transactions

The course made PE & VC documentation so much less intimidating… the examples were absolutely spot on.

Certification Courses A Practical Guide to Legal Documents in PE & VC Transactions

It was the perfect blend of law and business… I finally understood how term sheets and SHA clauses actually work in practice.

Certification Courses A Practical Guide to Legal Documents in PE & VC Transactions

The speaker explained complex transactional terms beautifully… it’s a must for anyone getting into corporate law.

Certification Courses A Practical Guide to Legal Documents in PE & VC Transactions

Engaging, clear, and full of practical insights… exactly what I needed to feel more confident while drafting investment documents.

Certification Courses Online Summer School: Commercial Litigation – Foundations of Commercial Litigation and Corporate Disputes

The coursework was extremely detailed and well-structured… the lectures and guest sessions were really insightful, and the quizzes made learning fun.

Certification Courses Online Summer School: Commercial Litigation – Foundations of Commercial Litigation and Corporate Disputes

The faculty explained even complex litigation concepts so clearly… and the real-life examples made everything easy to connect with.

Certification Courses Online Summer School: Commercial Litigation – Foundations of Commercial Litigation and Corporate Disputes

It was such an enriching course… the mix of theory and practical drafting exercises really helped strengthen my foundation in commercial disputes.

Certification Courses Online Summer School: Commercial Litigation – Foundations of Commercial Litigation and Corporate Disputes

Very informative and engaging throughout… the faculty and coordinator were so supportive and made sure every doubt was cleared.

Certification Courses Online Summer School: Commercial Litigation – Foundations of Commercial Litigation and Corporate Disputes

The course had a perfect balance between procedure and strategy… and honestly, I feel much more confident in handling commercial matters now.

Certification Courses Online Summer School: Commercial Litigation – Financial, Regulatory and Advanced Litigation Strategies

The speaker is honestly on another level… her way of simplifying complex litigation topics was just unmatched.

Certification Courses Online Summer School: Commercial Litigation – Financial, Regulatory and Advanced Litigation Strategies

The course was so detailed and well structured… I’ve genuinely learned a lot about financial and regulatory disputes.

Certification Courses Online Summer School: Commercial Litigation – Financial, Regulatory and Advanced Litigation Strategies

Extremely engaging! The real-world examples and case discussions made every class interesting and relatable.

Certification Courses Online Summer School: Commercial Litigation – Financial, Regulatory and Advanced Litigation Strategies

Very interactive and clear… all our doubts were patiently answered, and each session felt like solid progress.

Certification Courses Online Summer School: Commercial Litigation – Financial, Regulatory and Advanced Litigation Strategies

The best part was how it balanced theory and strategy… it truly enhanced my understanding of commercial litigation practice.